home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- NATION, Page 31Sticking to His Guns
-
-
- Cheney chops the Pentagon budget but refuses to reshape it
-
- By BRUCE VAN VOORST
-
-
- Frustrated at the failure of the Bush Administration to
- redefine U.S. defense posture in the face of changes in the
- Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, Democratic Senator Sam Nunn has
- delivered a series of speeches on "defense-budget blanks."
- Chairman of the powerful Senate Armed Services Committee, Nunn
- pointed to a "threat blank" based on a dated U.S. assessment of
- Soviet military power, a "strategy blank" unfilled by Pentagon
- planners and, most important, a "program blank" in which
- requests for tens of billions of dollars in new weapons are
- unsupported by any rationale. Deciding on the defense budget,
- said Nunn, is "little better than pulling a number out of the
- air."
-
- The cuts that Defense Secretary Dick Cheney unveiled last
- week are the most significant so far, but they fail the Nunn
- test. Rather than rethinking weapons programs, Cheney simply
- trimmed some back and stretched them out. The proposals:
-
- -- Reduce the purchase of B-2 Stealth bombers from 132 to
- 75. But Cheney did not persuasively explain why the U.S. needs
- another expensive, as yet unproven strategic bomber at all when
- the Air Force already has the new B-1 bomber and the still
- reliable B-52. Moreover, in one of the traditional paradoxes of
- military procurement, slashing and stretching out the Stealth
- program will increase the per-plane cost from $530 million to
- $815 million.
-
- -- Scale back the huge $240 million buy of C-17 transport
- planes, designed for rapid reinforcement in Europe, from 210 to
- 120. The longer warning time required for a Warsaw Pact attack,
- Cheney said, will permit more U.S. resupply by ship. Cheney also
- argued that the big C-17 can land on the shorter runways of
- Third World airports. But the C-17, though arguably necessary
- against the Warsaw Pact, is too much airplane for Third World
- tasks, and any successor should be more like the reliable C-141s
- still flying.
-
- -- Delay production of the Advanced Tactical Fighter from
- 1994 to 1996, but not cut the planned 750-plane, $79 billion
- program. Some congressional experts think the Air Force's
- present F-15 interceptor could last another decade.
-
- -- Proceed with production of the Navy's A-12 attack
- bomber, but slash the purchase order from 858 to 620. This was
- the first public confirmation that Cheney assumes that the Navy
- will operate with twelve aircraft-carrier battle groups, two
- less than at present. It also means no longer relying on the
- Navy's A-6 attack jet.
-
- Even though the Warsaw Pact is for all practical purposes
- defunct, Cheney insists that the Soviet Union remains a military
- superpower capable of destroying the U.S. with a nuclear attack
- or striking at Western Europe. But at least he now concedes that
- the U.S. can slow its own buildup because Soviet forces are
- being reduced. The Stealth program, he said, can be cut in part
- because the Pentagon is preparing to reduce thousands of targets
- for nuclear attack in the Soviet Union. Cheney said his cuts
- would save $2.4 billion from next year's requested $295 billion
- defense bill, with a cumulative total of nearly $35 billion by
- 1997. But to many in Congress, his proposals reflected little
- more than manipulation and improvisation. House Armed Services
- Committee chairman Les Aspin said that Cheney failed to explain
- whether the cuts reflected the changing strategic situation,
- doubts about the weapons or the domestic budget crunch. Nunn
- called Cheney's efforts a "fiscal exercise" without "the
- strategic underpinning I would like to see in the future."
-
- If Congress does not like his proposals, Cheney challenged,
- it should come up with its own. "It's easy to pontificate about
- what the overall top line ought to be," he said. "But as soon as
- we get down to the real nitty-gritty, there's a noticeable lack
- of any significant, substantive plans on Capitol Hill." True as
- that may be, it is not an excuse for lack of initiative or
- leadership by the Executive Branch. The Bush Administration must
- reduce military spending by a further $100 billion to meet its
- five-year goals. Reaching that number may require filling in Sam
- Nunn's blanks.
-
-
- ____________________________________________________________
- CHENEY'S CUTS
-
- Number of planes Savings
-
- B-2 bomber From 132 to 75 $14.4 billion
-
- C-17 transport From 210 to 120 12.6 billion
-
- A-12 attack bomber From 858 to 620 17.3 billion
-
-
-
-